2

Why has Ubuntu committed to a 6-month release cycle? Why should it have a fixed cycle at all?

Doesn't that go against the "if it ain't broken don't fix it" saying?

yannis
  • 39,547
  • 40
  • 183
  • 216
user541686
  • 8,074
  • 8
  • 38
  • 49

2 Answers2

6

From https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TimeBasedReleases#Why does Ubuntu use time-based releases?

Ubuntu releases are challenging because they represent an aggregation of the work of thousands of independent software projects. We feel that a time-based release process enables us to provide our users with the best balance of the latest software, tight integration, and excellent overall quality.

I agree personally that frequent releases is the best way to get software out to users. The problem is that to make a good release you need to do thorough testing which takes time and effort. The 6 months cycle is the compromise Ubuntu chose.

0

Every time you install a new version, things break. I am running 10.04 LTS. I assume that anything that apt-get upgrades will not break my code. If I upgraded to 10.09 libraries move, directories change, things will break, and for what? Latest features? No thanks. LTS is good for servers which need stability more than anything else.

I expect 12.04 to be LTS.

Andy Canfield
  • 2,083
  • 12
  • 10
  • https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LTS –  May 07 '11 at 14:55
  • How are you upgrading? The only problem I've ever had with an upgrade was getting my partitions mixed up once and blasting my home and var directories - all the rest have been smooth as butter – HorusKol May 08 '11 at 23:52