The book Software Metrics A Rigorous and Practical Approach defines measurement as
...the process by which numbers or symbols are assigned to attributes of entities in the real world in such a way so as to describe them according to clearly defined rules.
but what does it mean by "clearly defined rules"? Does this mean rules for assignment and comparison?
So, is “blue” a measure of the color of the room? Would "Bill" be a measure of the name of somebody? If not, why?
It then goes on to talk about the representational theory of measurement, defining measurement as a mapping from a domain to a range (Is this related to the earlier definition?):
...the mapping from the empirical world to the formal, relational world.
and that:
We can use real numbers, integers, or even a set of non-numeric symbols.
as the range. Note that it includes non-numeric symbols because then it says:
The representation condition asserts that a measurement mapping M must map entities into numbers...
Isn't this a contradiction?