What is the point of Java's package naming convention?

Question

I don't understand why Java uses the reverse of a (probably hypothetical) domain name as the name of a package, while mostly there is no connection between the domain name that some people uses and the products that they have. A lot of developers don't even have any domain.

What are the reasons of this naming convention, if any?

Even without a domain it's common practice in Java-land to pretend you do for package naming. E.g. in your case you would use `com.louisrhys.xxx.yyy` whether or not you own `louisrhys.com` — Wayne Molina, Oct 31 '11 at 15:45

score 16 · Accepted Answer · answered Oct 31 '11 at 07:35

16

Global uniqueness. If everyone, or at least serious developers who distribute their code beyond in-house projects, adheres to that convention, it will never happen that you get name clashes when you add another third-party library to your project. Bear in mind that Java was initially propagated as a solution for code deployment anywhere, anytime (via applets and remote classloading over the internet).

answered Oct 31 '11 at 07:35

Kilian Foth

107,706
45
295
310

3

In Java 1.4 Sun used open source Apache XML tools without changing the name space. Made it rather "interesting" to try to have a newer version in your own applications. – Oct 31 '11 at 08:45
3

`Java was initially propagated as a solution for code deployment anywhere, anytime` As opposed to what Java is now? I don't know about you but I still somewhat successfully use Java WebStart to deploy client side code to thousands of PC's in an internal network. This makes "Release Early, Release Often" far less painful for everybody. – maple_shaft Oct 31 '11 at 12:07
2

Not necessarily true. You will eventually lose a domain name; whether by dying or just forgetting to renew it. Someone else could buy it, and, without realizing, put out a Java package that conflicts with yours. And there's also the possibility that someone owned the domain before you and put out code that your code conflicts with. – Kevin Feb 14 '16 at 22:19
@maple_shaft It hasn't been that for most users since the decline of Java applets. Rather it's just another platform for applications (like, say, Qt or XUL or Electron). – user253751 Dec 04 '16 at 23:23

score 12 · Answer 2 · answered Oct 31 '11 at 07:33

12

As Wikipedia says on the subject,

"The Java Language Specification establishes package naming conventions to avoid the possibility of two published packages having the same name."

answered Oct 31 '11 at 07:33

LaLeX

221
1
2

Does the specification detail what convention to use if the developer doesn't have their own domain name? – FrustratedWithFormsDesigner Oct 31 '11 at 14:46
@FrustratedWithFormsDesigner: [No it doesn't](http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/packages.html#7.7). – Mike Seymour Oct 31 '11 at 15:08
@MikeSeymour: So... we can name them however we want in that case? Woohoo! :) – FrustratedWithFormsDesigner Oct 31 '11 at 15:17
1

@FrustratedWithFormsDesigner You can name them however you want in any case. If you want other people to use your software you should follow the specification and infer a logical and likely unique namespace if you don't have an actual domain. – Jeremy Oct 31 '11 at 15:47

score 2 · Answer 3 · answered Oct 31 '11 at 11:56

I found two Oracle-published documents that discuss the naming of packages. There is the Naming a Package page in the Java Tutorials and the Packages section of the Java Language Specification.

The primary purpose of this convention is to try to minimize conflicts between packages published by different organizations.

What is the point of Java's package naming convention?

3 Answers3

Linked

Related