Why are assumptions important when defining a puzzle?

Question

in this question OP has presented a site where some puzzle are available. He described the problem about solving them. I was curious is that really so problematic. The first one was really easy, so I tried next one this time from the end that should be the hardest one (puzzle).

And here I have some problem with understating it or probably I am messing something.

Let focus on the example:

Data:

M1      C1      C2      277317
M2      C2      C1      26247
M3      C1      C3      478726
M4      C3      C1      930382
M5      C2      C3      370287
M6      C3      C2      112344

Result:

617317
2 3 6

My problem is that relying on the assumption that

any one compound can be used in a chemical reaction to create any other compound

The solution could be

508878
2 6 5

Why ? In the content of the task, we do not have sad anything about that we have to start with compound one then from this get two then from two, three etc.

So the result should be to have all cheapest compounds, basing on the assumption we dont need to care how it was created. So this reduce our problem to structure like this.

M1      C2      277317
M2      C1      26247
M3      C3      478726
M4      C1      930382
M5      C3      370287
M6      C2      112344

And from this list we should pick the lowest cost for each compound.

So how did the achieve that solution, 2 3 6 ?

By me they have used to complex logic for that, their basic assumption was that

C1 -> C2 is the same as C2 -> C1 so they have used a rank (hash code)

17 * 37 * 1 * 2 == 17 * 37 * 2 * 1

(for this post i have used easier representation using the bit shift and bit-wise or that is more less the same)

M1    001 | 010 = 011  277317
M2    010 | 001 = 011  26247
M3    001 | 100 = 101  478726
M4    100 | 001 = 101  930382
M5    010 | 100 = 110  370287
M6    100 | 010 = 110  112344

After such operation the set of solution is reduced to this form

M1    3  277317
M2    3  26247
M3    5  478726
M4    5  930382
M5    6  370287
M6    6  112344

So now I don't have the information about compounds, but only a rank that provide the solution.

We had three compounds on start we have three ranks so is seams to be correct, and the result is the same that in the example (cost 508878 machines 2 6 5).

My observation is that the content of the puzzle is very funny but have a lot of holes in the limitation about the method that should be applied to achieve the result.

So concluding, what i am messing ?

score 1 · Accepted Answer · answered Oct 20 '11 at 17:39

1

I believe this is what you missed:

Facebook's lab must acquire enough machinery to ensure it can create all the necessary compounds no matter what compounds are available on the market

In other words, you must have enough machines so you will be able to go from X -> Y for any compounds X and Y. In your solution, 2 6 5, if you are given C1 you can't create C2 or C3.

answered Oct 20 '11 at 17:39

configurator

2,796
2
21
23

Yes, that is it. Lesson to learn, improve the English skills. – Damian Leszczyński - Vash Oct 21 '11 at 08:11

score 0 · Answer 2 · answered Oct 20 '11 at 16:01

0

If you assume that you only can change C1 once, C2 once and C3 once. Then you only have 2 possibilities:

1577986
1 4 5

or

617317
2 3 6

Where the second is the cheaper one, and the solution

answered Oct 20 '11 at 16:01

Daniel

101
1

I do not follow the logic, why not 123 or 456 for example ? I only change once there to ? – Damian Leszczyński - Vash Oct 20 '11 at 16:10
Well, I think you are supposed to change one of C1, one of C2 and one of C3. So 123 doesn't work because you are changing C1,C2, and C1 again – Daniel Oct 21 '11 at 08:27

Why are assumptions important when defining a puzzle?

2 Answers2