10

I'd like to build a simple AM radio (so simple it will only receive a single AM channel).

What is the simplest way to build a single channel AM radio that will output to an 8ohm speaker? (e.g. 1030 AM)

My current thinking is along the following somewhat vague lines, but I'm hoping to make them more concrete.

  1. use a piece of wire as an antenna
  2. create an LC circuit to tune input from antenna to the desired frequency
  3. amplify the signal
  4. connect amplified signal to speaker

Aside from the antenna, I would prefer to use "discrete" off the shelf components such as capacitors and inductors of particular values that I could plug into my breadboard.

user207421
  • 881
  • 1
  • 8
  • 18
Jon
  • 179
  • 2
  • 9
  • It also helps to pick a strong station. I noticed mentioned 1.03 MHz. If you're near Boston MA, that's a good choice since it's 50 kW clear channel. Back in grade school, I could pick it up about 20 miles northeast with just a crystal radio and headphones. I did have about a 50 foot antenna from my window to a shed in the back yard. That helped a lot. – Olin Lathrop Feb 13 '14 at 22:44
  • What's with the close votes? This is certainly on topic, and the OP has shown he has at least given it some thought. It's clear enough what he's asking, and it's well enough written. What's the problem? – Olin Lathrop Feb 13 '14 at 22:54
  • @OlinLathrop I don't like the requirements. "Simplest" without specifying some minimum performance requirement isn't a great specification. This is one of the few cases where I think more subjective requirements are better: I'd feel better if it asked for a "good design for educational purposes", but even better would be if it asked about a *specific* part of the design issue. It's bordering on a "discuss with me" type question due to the lack of a clear problem, and inclusion of half a solution. – Phil Frost Feb 14 '14 at 02:09
  • @PhilFrost - simplest, yet still capable of receiving a single AM channel. That's fairly clear requirements. – TDHofstetter Aug 29 '14 at 14:58
  • It is ridiculously easy to build an AM radio. Several years ago I built one from a LMC660 quad opamp. I actually designed it to be a guitar preamp, but when I touched the input lead with by bare finger, it picked up the local AM station very well! – Logic Knight Oct 02 '14 at 07:57

5 Answers5

12

Simplest possible AM receiver that outputs to an 8 ohm speaker:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

This radio has:

  • extremely poor selectivity
  • extremely poor sensitivity
  • extremely poor volume
  • extremely poor fidelity

It is however, without a doubt, the simplest radio that meets your requirements. It works because the voice coil can pick up RF currents just like an antenna, and these currents will move the diaphragm. It will help to use a very cheap speaker, since these have worse shielding.

You will need to be quite close to the transmitter for it to work however, due to the poor sensitivity. And also far from other transmitters, because it pretty much has no selectivity. Being entirely passive and also being very insensitive, the speaker won't be very loud, and since speakers aren't really intended to be operated in this manner, I'm sure the audio fidelity will be horrible. It is, however, obviously maximally simple.

While not an especially good receiver, it is an instructive example, and it does work. It demonstrates that radios aren't magic, and electromagnetic radiation can interact with just about anything. The only thing you need to receive AM is a detector: anything that responds to current differently in one direction or another.

Phil Frost
  • 56,804
  • 17
  • 141
  • 262
  • Anyone care to explain how this is *not* the simplest receiver? Does it not work? Or is there something simpler? – Phil Frost Feb 13 '14 at 22:20
  • This is missing the detector. Other than something accidentally acting as a diode, this won't pick up AM. – Olin Lathrop Feb 13 '14 at 22:22
  • @OlinLathrop The detector is the nonlinear magnetic materials in the speaker. – Phil Frost Feb 13 '14 at 22:24
  • Make an (especially) crappy connection between the antenna and the speaker that acts as a copper oxide rectifier. – Spehro Pefhany Feb 13 '14 at 22:30
  • Even if the speaker reacts non-linearly to high frequencies, those high frequencies will still have a 0 average level, which is what the speaker will produce as sound. The magnetic material would have to be non-linear differently in each direction to act as detector. – Olin Lathrop Feb 13 '14 at 22:33
  • @OlinLathrop I'm not so sure there isn't such a property in real speakers, but I'll add a diode to be sure. – Phil Frost Feb 13 '14 at 22:42
  • I've undone my downvote, but I still think this is a bad answer. A unstated but clear requirement is that you are actually able to *listen* to the AM program. Without even a antenna, you'd have a hard time hearing anything even if you put the speaker to your ear and are standing near a AM transmitter tower. – Olin Lathrop Feb 13 '14 at 22:49
  • 1
    @OlinLathrop I don't argue that it's good in any way, but I think the understanding of how this works (to the extent that it does) is a good step towards understanding how more useful radios work. Arguably, *this* is the radio, and everything else is just an improvement to address one of the "extremely poor" qualities enumerated in the answer. I probably learned more about radios by accidentally making them with a $20 Radio Shack kit while my father was repairing AM broadcast stations than I did reading schematics of intentional, "useful" radios. – Phil Frost Feb 14 '14 at 02:05
  • I agree here in that while extremely crude, it does answer the question of how radios work. Coil picking up, diode providing envelope detection, speaker cone transmitting modulated envelope. The only issue I see here (which isn't enough to cancel my upvote for creativity) is that it doesn't provide any degree of usefulness, and beginners like to be able to use their creations - with no real amplification or sensitivity, the only stimulus you'll get out of this is possibly some buzz. Good answer, though, overall, demonstrates the point well. – ecfedele Aug 30 '14 at 01:22
  • 2
    A fellow I used to work with lived in Berlin when he was a child. He could use a speaker and a diode to listen to the Voice of America transmitter. Connect one end of the diode to the speaker, hold the other end of the diode in one hand and touch the other hand to the other speaker terminal. Presto! Instant AM Receiver. This of course only worked because he lived near the transmitter, and it transmitted with some god awful amount of power (100KW or more.) – JRE Oct 02 '14 at 06:55
10

Your basic strategy to use a piece of wire for the antenna, into a L-C resonant circuit tuned to the frequency of the desired station, amplify that, then connect to a speaker is on the right track but misses at least one important step. That is to detect the AM signal, or to demodulate the amplitude modulated radio signal to get the original audio signal.

After the demodulator, you should also add a stage to drive the 8 Ω speaker with. That will be a stage meant to produce power, not necessarily amplify the voltage. To skip this, you can make just a line level audio signal and feed it into some ordinary audio amplifier, or powered speaker like you would hook up to a PC sounds card. The powered speaker is really just a power amplifier and speaker in a single box.

The simplest AM detector is just a diode. The output of the diode effectively rides the peaks of the RF signal, and goes up and down with its amplitude. You set up the impedance driven by the diode such that the output decays slowly enough so that it doesn't change much in the gap between carrier cycles, but does change fast enough to follow the modulated signal. Fortunately this isn't too hard since there is a large frequency ratio from audio to carrier. If the highest audio frequency is 5 kHz and the carrier is 1 MHz, then you have 200:1 difference.

A even better way to make a detector is to use a bipolar transistor as emitter follower. You can think of this as a powered diode in this application:

This audio out signal can probably be fed directly into a PC "powered speaker".

Olin Lathrop
  • 310,974
  • 36
  • 428
  • 915
  • That "detector" won't work unless the carrier level extends into the base-to-emitter diode's knee, where it can at least start to rectify. Here are three examples showing the three basic ways to hook a tank up to a 1070 kHz carrier modulated 100% by 1kHz: https://www.dropbox.com/s/vxllec30tfspij6/RF%20detect%20NOT.asc?dl=0 notice that the integrator's output is just an attenuated version of the modulated carrier and that no detection has taken place. – EM Fields Aug 30 '14 at 21:28
  • @EMFi: I was trying to show the concept, not the details of biasing the circuit. I'd bias this circuit by holding the base about one diode drop above ground at fairly high impedance, then AC couple the carrier to the base. – Olin Lathrop Aug 31 '14 at 11:56
6

Some of the simplest AM radio receivers were based on the ZN414 - a radio on a single chip in a TO-92 package. (replaced by the MK484).

enter image description here

enter image description here

It is poorly suited to drive an 8\$\Omega\$ speaker directly (it won't be very loud) but you could add an LM386 amplifier as shown here.

enter image description here

If you really want to work with discrete transistors rather than ICs hiding in transistor packages, you could just follow up that tuned loopstick-capacitor circuit with a diode detector (a germanium such as a 1N34A or Schottky diode such as a BAT54 would be best) and an audio amplifier. The missing part of your list is the detector, which converts the RF envelope into audio.

Spehro Pefhany
  • 376,485
  • 21
  • 320
  • 842
3

This is the speaker variant of my crystal radio.

enter image description here

Output impedance of the order of a few hundred ohms necessitates use of a matching transformer for the speaker.

A power transformer, with its inherent thick conductors, is an ideal substitute for a low-loss output transformer.

Trials with transformers rated 230V/24V-2A, 230V/24V-5A and 230V/24V-15A proved that the last one is the best.

Reception of the lone local 200kW 612kHz AM broadcast station, located 20km away, is quite good.

The wire antenna used is just 60' long.

vu2nan
  • 15,929
  • 1
  • 14
  • 42
  • And for some more details, there's a resonable [Wikipedia article on the crystal radio](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_radio), although no loudspeaker variants are mentioned there, it seems. (In fact the page currently says it's impossible to build a crystal radio powering loudspeakers.) – Fizz Jan 01 '15 at 21:15
  • And this is one case where Wikipedia is (obviously) wrong. I even found a transcription (but with original photographs/diagrams) of a 1960s crystal radio with a loudspeaker [taken from the August 1960 issue of Popular Electronics](http://www.rfcafe.com/references/popular-electronics/high-power-crystal-set-august-1960-popular-electronics.htm). It uses the same transformer idea as the above diagram, as you'd expect, but it's a little bit more sophisticated: has tuning capability, etc. – Fizz Jan 01 '15 at 21:28
  • @Nandu I didn't realize AM stations could transmit at 200 kW anywhere in the world. In the US, they are limited to 50 kW. – tcrosley May 01 '15 at 10:17
  • Hi Crosley, Here's a list of radio stations in India including the high power AM ones! http://allindiaradio.gov.in/wpresources/airstationslist.pdf –  May 02 '15 at 04:15
  • @tcrosley - Hi Crosley, That link is broken. Here's another. https://www.qsl.net/vu2jos/mw/freq.htm – vu2nan Mar 11 '23 at 10:52
1

The circuit of my simple AM demodulator :

enter image description here

musefian
  • 139
  • 2
  • 12