I was solving a problem regarding HPBW. From what I understood, HPBW of antenna is the angular separation on the beam where the radiation intensity is half of its maximum value. That means U(radiation intensity)=Umax/2 at HPBW
Now in the solution of this question they have written U(at HPBW)=0.5. Isn’t it wrong? I mean this equation dictates that the value is half (0.5) but it should be half of its peak value, according to the actual definition.

- 13,064
- 6
- 46
- 63

- 3
- 3
-
It looks good to me. Why are you seeing a problem? – Andy aka Oct 22 '22 at 14:15
-
U at HPBW should be Umax/2 not just 1/2. In the given solution they have written U=0.5, doesnt that mean that the actual value is 0.5, but according to the definition it should drop to half of its peak?? – user305532 Oct 22 '22 at 14:17
2 Answers
Power is proportional to the square of intensity; so for half power, you need \$1/\sqrt2\$ intensity; and \$1/\sqrt2\approx 0.707\$.
And 0.5 is the correct absolute power, since the \$\max\limits_x \,\cos^2(x)\cos^2(3x) = 1\$.

- 88,280
- 5
- 131
- 237
They defined \$U(\theta)\$ as the "normalized radiation intensity" or "power pattern", not the radiation intensity. The formula they gave contains only unitless factors, so it is surely not the actual radiation intensity.
I take this to mean that \$U(\theta)\$ is normalized to have a value of 1 at its peak. This is confirmed by the fact that the formula given is a product of cosine terms, which can't have a maximum value greater than 1.
Then it is correct that at the angle where the intensity is half the peak value, we'd have \$U(\theta)=0.5\$.

- 126,425
- 3
- 159
- 304