0

I was solving a problem regarding HPBW. From what I understood, HPBW of antenna is the angular separation on the beam where the radiation intensity is half of its maximum value. That means U(radiation intensity)=Umax/2 at HPBW Now in the solution of this question they have written U(at HPBW)=0.5. Isn’t it wrong? I mean this equation dictates that the value is half (0.5) but it should be half of its peak value, according to enter image description herethe actual definition.

winny
  • 13,064
  • 6
  • 46
  • 63
  • It looks good to me. Why are you seeing a problem? – Andy aka Oct 22 '22 at 14:15
  • U at HPBW should be Umax/2 not just 1/2. In the given solution they have written U=0.5, doesnt that mean that the actual value is 0.5, but according to the definition it should drop to half of its peak?? – user305532 Oct 22 '22 at 14:17

2 Answers2

2

Power is proportional to the square of intensity; so for half power, you need \$1/\sqrt2\$ intensity; and \$1/\sqrt2\approx 0.707\$.

And 0.5 is the correct absolute power, since the \$\max\limits_x \,\cos^2(x)\cos^2(3x) = 1\$.

Marcus Müller
  • 88,280
  • 5
  • 131
  • 237
1

They defined \$U(\theta)\$ as the "normalized radiation intensity" or "power pattern", not the radiation intensity. The formula they gave contains only unitless factors, so it is surely not the actual radiation intensity.

I take this to mean that \$U(\theta)\$ is normalized to have a value of 1 at its peak. This is confirmed by the fact that the formula given is a product of cosine terms, which can't have a maximum value greater than 1.

Then it is correct that at the angle where the intensity is half the peak value, we'd have \$U(\theta)=0.5\$.

The Photon
  • 126,425
  • 3
  • 159
  • 304