-2

I was reading this post How are positive and negative feedback of opamps so different? How to analyse a circuit where both are present? for identifying positive/negative feedback of op-amp circuit.

Consider the circuit shown in figure(1):

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

According to the approach suggested by nidhin:
$$v_-=v_{in}=1.6 \quad (\text{by inspection})$$ $$v_+=\frac{4}{3+4}v_o=\frac{4}{7}v_o$$ Now substituting in the formula: \$ v_{o}=A_{ol}(v_+−v_−)\$ , we get:
$$v_{o}=A_{ol}(\frac{4}{7}v_o− 1.6)$$ $$\implies v_o (1- \frac{4}{7}A_{ol} )=-1.6 A_{ol}$$ $$\implies v_o =\frac{-1.6 A_{ol}}{1- \frac{4}{7}A_{ol} }$$ $$\implies \frac{v_o}{1.6} =\frac{- A_{ol}}{1- \frac{4}{7}A_{ol} }$$ $$\text{so, } A_{cl}=\lim_{A_{ol}\to \infty} \frac{v_o}{v_{in}} =\lim_{A_{ol}\to \infty} \frac{v_o}{1.6}=\lim_{A_{ol}\to \infty} \frac{- A_{ol}}{1- \frac{4}{7}A_{ol} }=\frac{-1}{- \frac{4}{7} }=1.75$$ Now, as \$ A_{cl}\$ is finite , \$ \implies \$ net feedback is negative

But according to the approach suggested by Alfred Centauri:
Assume there is a net negative feedback, \$\implies \$ the non-inverting and inverting input voltages are equal $$\therefore 1.6=\frac{4}{7}v_o$$ $$\implies v_o= 2.8$$ However, $$ A_{cl}= \frac{v_o}{v_{in}}=\frac{2.8}{1.6}= 1.75>0 $$ which is a \$ {\color{red}{\text{red flag}}} \$ since inverting-amplifier should have negative gain
Hence, our assumption is wrong
so according to this approach, net feedback is positive
which is making me confused;
Hence,

1)Identify the net feedback in figure(1) with explanations
2)If the circuit in figure(1) is in net negative feedback, then where did i make a mistake in implementing Alfred's ideas, or
If the circuit in figure(1) is in net positive feedback, then where did i make a mistake in implementing nidhin's ideas

UPDATE:
If we use a non-ideal voltage source \$ V_{in}=1 \$ volt with \$ R_s =1 K \Omega \$ , i.e,

schematic

simulate this circuit
then, please explain the type of feedback

Suresh
  • 145
  • 2
  • 15
  • Sorry, I misread the original circuit. But you still mixed up which op-amp terminal is connected to the circuit input. – The Photon Jan 01 '21 at 18:05
  • I have tried my best to improve this post, now if the post is OK, then please remove the downvotes – Suresh Jan 03 '21 at 07:44

2 Answers2

5

You have mis-represented the circuit in the previous question which was given as this:

enter image description here

In the original the input is applied to the non-inverting op-amp input. In your version you connected the input to the inverting input.

If you use an ideal voltage source to provide the input to this circuit, then there is no positive feedback, because the feedback signal is shorted out by the very low resistance of the voltage source.

which is a red flag since inverting-amplifier should have negative gain

The original problem presented a non-inverting amplifier, not an inverting amplifier.

In your version of the circuit, this is indeed a red flag. It shows you you have made a wrong assumption when you assumed the net feedback is negative. In fact in your circuit the net feedback is positive, because the negative feedback signal is shorted by the ideal voltage source.

The Photon
  • 126,425
  • 3
  • 159
  • 304
  • If we use a non-ideal voltage source \$ V_{in}=1\$ volt with \$ R_s=1K \Omega \$ , then will the negative feedback signal still be shorted? – Suresh Jan 03 '21 at 07:41
  • please explain what mistakes i have made using nidhin's approach – Suresh Jan 03 '21 at 07:42
  • The error in nidhins approach is as follows (see 3rd line): Using vo=Aol(v+-v-), he automatically has assumed that the opamp works in its linear amplification range. But this assumption is wrong due to missing negative feedback. – LvW Jan 03 '21 at 10:05
1

Both configurations are in use. Both circuits represent a "Negative Impedance Converter" (NIC).

However (for Rf=feedback resistor to the input path, Rx=feedback resistor to the other input and Ro=grounded resistor),

  • the first circuit (input at the inverting amplifier) is called "open-circuit stable" and - for stable operation - we require a source resistance RS>RfRo/Rx

  • the second circuit (input at the non-inv. input) is called "short-circuit stable" for RS<RfRo/Rx

Application: A combination of both versions leads to a very versatile active block which is always stable (Generalized Impedance Converter, GIC). The NIC (non-inv. input) is used as a basic building block for a non-inverting integrator (DEBOO integrator).

LvW
  • 24,857
  • 2
  • 23
  • 52
  • Why we require a source resistance \$ R_S > R_f \cdot \frac{R_o}{R_x} \$ for stable operation for the **first** circuit? could you please derive this relation – Suresh Jan 23 '21 at 06:55
  • 1
    The answer is simple: Because for stable operation, the negative feedback must govern over positive feedback. Hence, Rs/Rf>Ro/Rx. – LvW Jan 23 '21 at 09:24