1

In an ideal Wilkinson power divider(because in practical there will always be resistive loss), the scattering parameters, or S matrix is given as:

S matrix

From the condition that checks if network is loss-less or not which is:

Say s-parameters matrix is S(nxn). Transpose of S is X and conjugate of S is Y then X.Y=I (Identity Matrix) if network is lossless.

It turns out that the power divider is lossy as X.Y is not equal to I. Then how does the input power split equally at outputs? It means Pi=Po1+Po2(where Pi is input power, Po1 and Po2 are output powers at any 2 output ports; Po=Po1+Po2). Thus, net power loss=(Po-Pi)=0.

Does it not violate the fact that network is lossy. Or is it that Scattering parameters deal with the overall network meaning a lossy network can have a lossless path in it? If the latter is true then it makes sense to me and I can safely conclude that "A lossless network means all paths are lossless and a lossy means at least one path is lossy"[Path here meaning a road from any input to any output].

As stated in Wilkinson Power Divider, an image of which I am attaching if link goes down: Wilkinson Power Divider In its ideal form there would not be any resistive loss, so then would the s-parameter matrix differ from the one that I have attached above to reflect the lossless attribute?

Neil_UK
  • 158,152
  • 3
  • 173
  • 387
Prasanjit Rath
  • 171
  • 1
  • 8
  • Are you talking about an ideal divider, or a real one? What is the precise "condition that checks if a network is loss-less or not" that you're referring to? – Shamtam Oct 12 '20 at 16:19

2 Answers2

2

The ideal Wilkinson does not have any loss when transferring signals from port 1 to ports 2 and 3: $$|S_{11}|^2 + |S_{21}|^2 + |S_{31}|^2 = 1$$

When the input is given at port 2 or port 3, it is not lossless: $$|S_{12}|^2 + |S_{22}|^2 + |S_{32}|^2 \ne 1$$

Therefore we don't classify it as a lossless network in the general sense, even though it is lossless in its usual application.

The Photon
  • 126,425
  • 3
  • 159
  • 304
  • So, that means a network that is categorized as lossy due to its S matrix can have at least one loss-less path, right? – Prasanjit Rath Oct 12 '20 at 17:01
  • 1
    @PrasanjitRath, no it means the author who said the Wilkinson divider is lossless was being sloppy about their terminology; or at least they were talking about its behavior in a specific application, not its theoretical properties. – The Photon Oct 12 '20 at 17:02
0

When there is no voltage across the resistor, there is no power loss.

This means that when the 'wilky' is used as a power divider into two equal impedances, it's lossless.

When it's used as a power combiner between two general signals, then their difference appears across the resistor, and it's lossy.

When it's used as a power combiner between two equal amplitude identical signals in phase, the resistor doesn't see a voltage, and it's lossless again.

Neil_UK
  • 158,152
  • 3
  • 173
  • 387