1

I have made a PM DC motor. This motor works on a unique magnetic circuit. This motor can work very well at different input levels. When it uses an input of 5.915 volts*3.5 Amperes=20.7025 Watts, its output is 8.85 watts.

In this motor, 30% part of each commutator segment area is no-current area. It means that when the armature rotates no current is applied to it during 30% part of the rotation. No-current periods are unavoidable in the present commutation of my motor because the magnetic circuit does not allow the same current to pass through more than one coils.

The armature has 12 teeth and each of the teeth has been winded independently. So, the total coils of the armature are 12. The commutator comprises 24 segments. As a whole, the current passes through 12 segments while 12 segments are empty and are used to disconnect the current. The current passes through a segment then the next segment stops the current to flows, the third segment again allows the current to pass. This process remains going on.

The use of the smaller surface of carbon-brushes is compulsory so that two current-transferring segments should never be connected through the brush surface. Figure: enter image description here

My point about the effect of the no-current periods: The armature needs a specific amount of current during 70% part of the armature-rotation to do a specific work. 30% of armature-rotation occurs only because of momentum. No current is supplied to the armature during the 30% part of the rotation.

This motor uses 8 field poles. It is apparent that during the no-current periods the field poles attract the rotating armature very forcefully. It produces a heavy braking effect. Moreover, when the true current is disconnected because of the no-current areas of the commutation, back EMF might create reverse magnetization in the armature teeth. It should strengthen the braking effect. Practically, whenever I put off the line current (during the work of the motor), the motor halts all of a sudden. So, I assume that the braking effect is too heavy.

It is also apparent that the amount of the input current (3.5 amperes) is strong enough to perform the work as well as to overcome the loss of momentum caused by the heavy braking effect.

A higher than usual current is needed to perform the double task (to do the work and to overcome the braking effect). If the no-current periods are eliminated, the current will not have to overcome any loss of momentum. Moreover, the same current will find 30% more time to work. A lesser but even amount of current will be needed to do the same work. The even amount of the current should be 30% lesser than the present amount of the current: Present input is: 5.915 volts*3.5 Amperes=20.7025 Watts. The even amount of the current will be 30% lesser than the present amount of the current. Voltage would also reduce. So, only 10.144watts input would be needed instead of 20.7025 Watts. (The reduction in the current will be= 3.5 amperes/100*30=1.05 ampere. The Input after the removal of the no current periods should be=2.45 amperes* 4.1405 volts=10.144watts.)

I think that if the commutator is replaced with electronic sensors, there would be no need to maintain the no-current period. At this time, I am trying to guess the possible loss of power that is caused by the no-current periods.

Umer Farooq
  • 31
  • 5
  • 1
    You do also need to consider the contact area of the brush with the commutator. The armature only sees no current for 30% of the time if the brush is infinitely narrow. If it is as wide as the insulating slot the commutator always sees power via some part of the brush. In most motors it is even wider. –  May 01 '20 at 14:43
  • Sorry, I could not explain the right situation. I am preparing an appropriate description of the no-current situation. I will reply to your comment soon. I apologize for this inconvenience. – Umer Farooq May 01 '20 at 17:05
  • 1
    Related: https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/492161/why-is-it-an-advantage-that-carbon-brushes-have-high-resistance/492206#492206 –  May 01 '20 at 19:41
  • Thank you for providing very informative link. I have prepared the description in the response of your first comment. Link: https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YXST5ZlGTLXKJZ_urSYQIBKfHle8p9Pb – Umer Farooq May 02 '20 at 14:07
  • 2
    Please edit any additional information into your question, not as a link. Questions should not require links that might break in the future to be understood. – Kevin Reid May 02 '20 at 14:25
  • Thank you for the suggestion. I have edited the question. – Umer Farooq May 04 '20 at 08:28

1 Answers1

1

What force would be contributed to the motor during those no current periods? If there are not many commutator segments, it means your getting further and further away from the magnet you want to attract to or repel from, meaning more of the current in the coil would end up as heat, Instead of significant rotational torque. (The force is proportional to the angle)

Having the commutator segments too close also means a longer period of time where both segments may be powered, and as above, if your not angled correctly, your just loosing amperage to heating, not torque. I would guess the gap is fairly close to a half or a quarter of the width of the brush that makes contact with the commutator.

Next up braking force, There is not much when the coil is open, If the coil is open, you get a lot of voltage, but next to no current, so not much power is actually extracted from the motor acting as a generator, equally why a properly sized resistor can brake a motor much faster than shorting out the 2 input wires, the braking effect is dependent on how much energy your taking out of the motors rotational inertia. lots of V but tiny I and lots of I but tiny V are not as much as the resistor that is at the "maximum power point"

Reroute
  • 4,377
  • 6
  • 14
  • I am grateful to you for your answer. You have analyzed the situation very skillfully. Your answer has brought the most important aspects of this complicated matter to light. – Umer Farooq May 04 '20 at 10:39