Do current sources exist practically or is it just a concept? If there exist a practical current source, can you give some examples.
-
1Does a photovoltaic cell count? – jonk Nov 07 '16 at 07:42
-
@jonk Yes, I'd say so. Limited EMF, but still a non-ideal current source - by virtue of its operation. – Sean Houlihane Nov 07 '16 at 07:45
-
4Of course. There is no such thing as an ideal current source, but there is no such thing as an ideal voltage source either. Current sources are used in IC design all the time. Every op-amp probably has multiple current sources inside. – user57037 Nov 07 '16 at 08:22
-
4[What exactly is a current source?](http://electronics.stackexchange.com/q/28546/27052) – phuclv Nov 07 '16 at 08:27
-
There are no 'ideal' current sources, there are plenty of circuit that can be modeled as an ideal current source with limitations. Circuit elements are just models. – Voltage Spike Nov 07 '16 at 16:45
-
1Example: 4-20mA current loop – Chu Nov 08 '16 at 00:14
6 Answers
An ideal current source is a concept, and does not exist, cannot exist. Other useful concepts like an ideal resistor, an ideal voltage source, a 'light inextensible string' or 'frictionless surface' (I loved those two in physics lessons) don't and cannot exist either.
However, not only are these concepts useful mathematically, but they are also very useful as a first order approximation to the behaviour of many real physical things, and can be approximated to a greater or lesser degree of completeness by real physical things.
So we can approximate a current source by a transistor, with the base held at some potential which keeps a voltage across, and therefore a current through, an emitter resistor, which current appears at the collector. This current source has a non-infinite output impedance, varies with temperature, and cannot deliver infinite voltage into an open circuit, but is still useful, in certain applications.
An inductor, with a current flowing through it, at the time the switch controlling current to it opens, is best thought of as a current source. How to cope with the continuous current still coming from it, with the energy behind it to raise the output voltage to any high voltage sufficient to cause breakdown, is a good mental model for how to design the current paths and control components that are there to limit the voltage rise.
When a switch mode converter is controlled to vary its output, 'constant voltage' and 'constant current' are the two main models for what the control inside tries to do at the output terminals.
In the same way, real voltage sources cannot deliver infinite current, real resistors have some residual series inductance, and the only use for a light inextensible string is for tethering a spherical cow.

- 158,152
- 3
- 173
- 387
Of course they exist.
There are many cases, where current sources are applicable:
- LED Lighting
- Microelectronics (such as amplifiers, measurement devices, ...)
- Motor controllers
- ...
Often, they are realized by a control circuit (including an operational amplifier) that monitors the current using a shunt resistor, controlling it using a transistor.
You always want a current source, when your "output" is somewhat proportional to the current (motor torque, light, loudness)...

- 439
- 2
- 12
If you mean the dual of a battery, yes some such devices exist. Photovoltaic cells and betavoltaic cells are examples of devices that produce more-or-less constant current up to some maximum open-circuit voltage, just as a battery produces more-or-less constant voltage up to some maximum short-circuit current.
That said, in most electronics, current sources and sinks are artificially produced by manipulating energy from a relatively constant voltage source. A JFET or depletion-mode MOSFET plus a resistor or a simple combination of BJTs such as a Widlar current source are examples of such arrangements that can produce a wide range of currents.

- 376,485
- 21
- 320
- 842
I don`t think so. For my opinion, each current needs a driving voltage (perhaps, there are some "exotic" exceptions where we have a movement of charges - current - without an applied voltage).
However, in all of our classical electronic applications we realize devices which we call "current source" based on voltage sources, which allow a current which is - more or less - independent on the applied load (using a suitable control mechanism, regulation loop).
In particular, this is true for a continuous flow of charges (current).
EDIT: For my opinion, the "crux" is in the word "exist". I have tried to explain my view: Yes - there are electronic devices which we call "current source" because they can "deliver" a nearly constant current - independent on the connected load (within certain limits, of course). But - is the word "deliver" correct? Do these sources really deliver a current ? I think, they rather allow a current (which is driven - as each continuous current - by a voltage). And that is the reason that - from the physical point of view - we really do not have a "current source". The current of this source is determined by the driving voltage and a corresponding very large source resistance.

- 24,857
- 2
- 23
- 52
-
Not really - he was not asking about ideal sources, but "do practical ones exist". And they do. A current source need no more be made from a voltage source than vice versa. It's our normal view of things that makes it seem so. If all supplies were shorted when not in use and designed accordingly the isual supply would be a current source. – Russell McMahon Nov 07 '16 at 08:54
-
RusselMcMahon - he was also asking "..or is it just a concept ?". And I think, yes - it is just a "concept". We call a source "current source", when it is able to deliver a "nearly" constant current. However, in reality it is always a regulated/controlled voltage source (from th physical point of view). Finally, let me ask you: Do you know a "practical current source" which does get its energy NOT from a voltage source? Movement of charges needs a corresponding force (provided by the E-field, resp. the related voltage). – LvW Nov 07 '16 at 09:22
-
" ... which does get its energy NOT from a voltage source? ... " is a question to which no answer could, for you, exist, as voltage and current when energy is being transferred are unavoidably entangled. Reverse V & I in the question and it is no more or less possible. || A Weston standard cell is a not to bad example of a current source and a voltage source simultaneously. Nothing should be done to dequibrillate the cell in terms of either voltage or current if it is do achieve its appointed task. We see it as a voltage reference but it is equally a current reference. || Modern PV ... – Russell McMahon Nov 07 '16 at 10:28
-
... panels (and cells) are current sources first and voltage sources second. Their voltage is close to constant across their Iout range and Iout is nicely proporional to solar (or other) insolation. At a given insolation level and constant load they are close to ideal insolation controlled current sources and far less close to being controlled voltage sources.The figure of merit (fill factor) and cell efficicny both improve as the cell becomes closer to ideal. So the answer to your question is "yes, in a non ideal manner", I think. – Russell McMahon Nov 07 '16 at 10:32
-
Yes - I have expected the example of a solar panel. But also in this case, one could discuss if there is a charge imbalance which is the cause of a current. Nevertheless - the whole question touches - more or less - "philosophical" or "linguistic" aspects because of the word "exist". I think, you will agree to this, don`t you? – LvW Nov 07 '16 at 10:38
-
None of the other answers agree with your claim re "philosophical point". Most touch in passing on the concept of an ideal xxx versus a practical xxx. BUT if you agree (as I think you will) that there exists a practical voltage source, resistor, capacitor, LED, transistor, inductor ... THEN there equally exists a practical current source. Yes? If not then nothing "practical" "exists" (which according to QM and Bishop [**Berkeley**](http://www.philosophypages.com/hy/4r.htm) may well be the case, and all is well in the garden. – Russell McMahon Nov 08 '16 at 07:11
-
RussellMcMahon, I have no problems in case "none of the other answers" agree with my "claim" (really a claim?). – LvW Nov 08 '16 at 08:00
-
From memory ... :-) - "There once was a man who said, God, Must find it exceedingly odd, When he sees that the tree, continues to be, when there's no-one about in the Quad". ||| & the response: "Dear sir, your astonishment's odd, **I** am always about in the Quad, And that's why the tree, continues to be, As observed by, yours faithfully, God. " :-) – Russell McMahon Nov 08 '16 at 10:37
-
RusselMcMahon, thank you for the story. But I ask myself: Why are you making fun about me and my word "philosophical resp. linguistic aspects"? Do you not understand? Perhaps you find a moment to think more deeply about the term "source" - and how we are using this term (and others) in our daily life. Is a solar panel really a source of energy? And - regarding this thread - is an electronic device we call "current source" really a "source" of current? Or isnt it rather a source of another quantity that "allows" a current? Shouldn`t we - from time to time - reflect our own use of words? – LvW Nov 08 '16 at 11:35
-
I am NOT meaning to 'make fun of you' - I'm sorry o\if it seemed that way. BUT, I AM having fun. It is not too often that one gets to discuss reality, existence or philosophy in general on SE EE. Such opportunities should be cherished, embellished and relished. Probably :-). I think about (believe it or no) existence, reality, perceptions , perspectives, use of words, "normality" and similar most of the time, while simultaneously trying to think of too much else as well. I think that in this case we have all strayed towards excessive philosophy compared o what the OP intended, BUT ... – Russell McMahon Nov 08 '16 at 11:58
-
... Most people seem unaware of how tenuous the reality of our reality is, how "imaginary friends" and/or utter impossibility are the only rational 'explanations' of reality, and that most (if not all) attempts at reasoned logical approaches demand that we make semi-arbitrary assumptions - which we are largely unaware of doing. All good fun. – Russell McMahon Nov 08 '16 at 12:01
-
Did you read again my answer - in particular the EDIT part? I have some experience in teaching students and engineers - and I have learned that it is not a bad idea to encourage even newcomers to be critical and curious. Do you really think, an answer like the foillowing would be of great help to the OP? : "Yes - a practical current source does exist - see the following example." Such an information - together with many circuit examples - could be better found in wikipedia etc. I think, a forum like this one should allow better and more detailed answers. – LvW Nov 08 '16 at 14:48
Define "exist". Of course, the perfect current source does not exist, because that would require it to produce infinitely high voltage in cases where the effective resistance across its terminal approaches infinity (i.e. if the source is left "unconnected"); infinite voltage doesn't exist. But the same goes for the perfect voltage source: no voltage source in this world will produce infinite current if shorted. In the end, it boils down to conservation of energy.
Now, for "practical" current sources: Of course they exist! They're a very important utility in very many (if not most) analog semiconductor circuits.
For example, if you did this:
simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab
You can transform a fixed voltage source to a fixed current source (by the way, this small circuit with the two transistors is called a "current mirror" and is really, really common in electronics). You'll find this in a lot of circuits – imagine you want to drive a series of LEDs with exactly 20mA, but you know that LEDs aren't perfect, so no two LEDs have exactly the same forward voltage, so driving them with a constant voltage and a series resistor isn't as good as actually driving them with a constant current. Or, for example, to imprint a specific current into a bigger transistor's base, for specific amplification usage.
Elementary, current sources are quite common in physics. Think about an LED: by pushing in electrons with a specific energy ("energy per charge" is voltage), you can fill one "hole" at lower energy levels in your semiconductor, emitting the energy difference of the electron before entering the semiconductor interface and after recombination as photon. So you get a fixed relation between "number of electrons per second" (==current) and "photons produced per second" (==brightness). The same works the other way around, too: If you shine a light on an LED, the amount of current it produces has a fixed relationship to the number of photons hitting the semiconductor "just right". Hence, with fixed brightness, you get fixed current – a real-world current source (in fact, if you optimize for efficiency at absorbing photons rather than emitting them, you get what is known as a photodiode).

- 88,280
- 5
- 131
- 237
What about lightning ? It comes from megavolts so the peak current is essentially the same whether there is a short to ground or to + or - 1Kv .The output pulses from some photomultiplier tubes can be looked at this way because the peak output voltage is proportional to the load impedence over a significant range .A permanent magnet DC generator would make a reasonable constant current source if it were driven with a constant torque source.

- 14,235
- 2
- 27
- 65
-
I don't think we should consider lightning a current source. After all, it's the exchange of charge between atmosphere and atmosphere or atmosphere and ground, but current is charge per time – and the speed at which lightning discharges e.g. a charged cloud isn't constant. – Marcus Müller Nov 07 '16 at 13:57